Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward task, but mistakes often occur. One common error is providing incorrect personal information. This includes the rated NCO's name, Social Security Number (SSN), and rank. If any of these details are wrong, it can lead to delays in processing and may affect the evaluation's validity. Always double-check these entries before submission.

Another frequent mistake is neglecting to include the correct dates for the evaluation period. The form requires specific start and end dates, and failing to fill these out accurately can create confusion. It is essential to ensure that the period covered aligns with the evaluation being conducted. This step is crucial for maintaining an accurate record of performance.

Many people also overlook the importance of the duty description section. This part should clearly outline the rated NCO’s responsibilities and contributions. A vague or incomplete description can misrepresent the individual’s performance. Providing detailed and precise information helps reviewers understand the context of the evaluation.

Additionally, signatures are often a source of errors. Both the rater and senior rater must sign the form. Missing signatures or incorrect dates can invalidate the evaluation. It is vital to ensure that all required signatures are present and that the dates are formatted correctly. This attention to detail can prevent unnecessary complications.

Lastly, some individuals forget to include the required email addresses for the rater and senior rater. This information is important for communication and verification purposes. Omitting it can hinder the review process. Always remember to fill in these fields to ensure a smooth evaluation experience.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, attention to detail is crucial. Here are some essential dos and don’ts to keep in mind:

• Do ensure that all names are written in the correct format: Last, First, Middle Initial.
• Do double-check the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number for accuracy.
• Do confirm that the rank and date of rank are correctly entered.
• Do provide a valid email address that ends in .gov or .mil for all rating officials.
• Do verify that the period covered is accurately reflected in the form.

• Don’t leave any required fields blank; incomplete information can delay processing.
• Don’t use personal email addresses; only official military emails are acceptable.
• Don’t forget to sign and date the form where indicated, as this confirms your acknowledgment.
• Don’t submit the form without reviewing it for any typographical errors or inconsistencies.
• Don’t ignore the importance of the comments section; this is an opportunity to provide context for evaluations.

What is the DA 2166-9-1 form used for?

The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant. It provides a structured way to assess their performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. The evaluations help in making decisions about promotions, assignments, and career development.

Who fills out the DA 2166-9-1 form?

The form is filled out by the NCO's rater, who is typically their immediate supervisor. The senior rater, who is usually a higher-ranking officer, also reviews and adds comments. Both the rater and senior rater must sign the form to validate the evaluation.

What information is required in Part I of the form?

Part I requires basic administrative data, including the NCO's name, Social Security Number or DOD ID, rank, date of rank, unit information, and the period covered by the evaluation. This section ensures that all evaluations are accurately attributed to the correct individual.

What does the rater evaluate in Part IV?

In Part IV, the rater assesses several key areas: character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area includes specific criteria that the rater must evaluate, providing a comprehensive view of the NCO's performance and contributions.

Can the rated NCO dispute the evaluation?

Yes, the rated NCO can dispute the evaluation. The form includes a section where the NCO acknowledges that they have seen the completed report and are aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. This process allows them to formally address any concerns they may have about their evaluation.

What is the significance of the "Senior Rater Overall Potential" section?

This section allows the senior rater to compare the rated NCO's potential to others in the same grade. The senior rater selects from categories such as "Most Qualified," "Highly Qualified," "Qualified," or "Not Qualified." This assessment is crucial for future assignments and promotions.

Are there any privacy concerns with the DA 2166-9-1 form?

Yes, there are privacy concerns. The form contains sensitive personal information, such as the NCO's Social Security Number. It is important to handle the form securely and ensure that it is only shared with authorized personnel. The Privacy Act Statement in AR 623-3 outlines how this information should be protected.

How often is the DA 2166-9-1 form completed?

The DA 2166-9-1 form is typically completed annually or at the end of a specific rating period. However, it may also be filled out more frequently if there are significant changes in the NCO's performance or duties. Regular evaluations help maintain accurate records of an NCO's career progression.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms serve similar purposes, focusing on performance evaluation, feedback, and professional development. Here’s a look at nine documents that share similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1:

• DA Form 67-9: This form is used for officer evaluation reports. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it assesses performance and potential, providing a structured format for feedback from superiors.
• DA Form 1059: This document serves as an academic evaluation report for soldiers who complete military training courses. It highlights performance and areas for improvement, similar to the evaluation aspects of the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 4856: The counseling form is utilized for documenting professional development discussions. It emphasizes feedback and goal setting, akin to the counseling component in the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the NCO evaluation report for higher ranks. It shares the same structure and purpose as the DA Form 2166-9-1 but is tailored for more senior NCOs.
• DA Form 2446: This form is used for documenting performance in the Army’s Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development System (NCOPDS). It focuses on professional growth and evaluation, similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 7566: This is the senior rater evaluation for NCOs. It assesses potential and performance, much like the senior rater section of the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 703: The Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) scorecard records physical fitness results. It aligns with the physical evaluation section of the DA Form 2166-9-1.

• Chick-fil-A Job Application: Completing the Chick-fil-A Job Application form is essential for those looking to join this esteemed fast-food chain. It requires applicants to provide critical details about their background and availability, similar to the thoroughness seen in forms like DA 2166-9-1. Start your application process by visiting mypdfform.com/blank-chick-fil-a-job-application.

• DA Form 268: This is a flagging action form used to document a soldier’s unfavorable information. It serves to track performance issues, similar to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 addresses performance deficiencies.
• DA Form 4856-1: This is a form for documenting developmental counseling sessions specifically for NCOs. It reinforces the importance of feedback and growth, paralleling the counseling elements in the DA Form 2166-9-1.

Each of these documents plays a vital role in the Army's evaluation system, ensuring that soldiers receive the guidance and feedback they need to succeed in their careers.